STORY PLANNER APP BACKUP SERIES
Thursday’s claims were the latest in a series of US briefings on American intelligence assessments, some of which have irritated Ukraine’s leadership and been rebuffed by officials in Kyiv. Last week, a Moscow-backed separatist leader in eastern Ukraine, Denis Pushilin, repeated a frequent Russian claim that Ukraine had plans to launch a chemical attack on the breakaway region. While massing troops around Ukraine, Russian officials have made repeated claims, without evidence, that Kyiv was planning to attack Russia or Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine rather than the other way round. “Perhaps because they are planning to stage that provocation?” “But how is it that they are able to anticipation that provocation?” Roscoe asked on Twitter.
![story planner app backup story planner app backup](https://media.wired.com/photos/616ddc3e992e066f9ac9b1b0/master/w_1600%2Cc_limit/Gear-Backup-Android-Google-Backup.jpg)
So ‘just in case’ it is provoked it has massed over 100,000 troops on Ukraine’s border. James Roscoe, a British diplomat at the United Nations said: “Russia says it will never invade Ukraine. The US and UK have alleged that Russia has deployed operatives inside Ukraine to stage false-flag attacks and has recruited Ukrainians to take over a puppet government that would collaborate with Russian occupation forces. She added: “The UK and our allies will continue to expose Russian subterfuge and propaganda and call it out for what it is.” Liz Truss, the foreign secretary, said the disclosures were “clear and shocking evidence of Russia’s unprovoked aggression and underhand activity to destabilise Ukraine”. The two countries routinely share intelligence as part of the wider Five Eyes network – and London has been as ready as Washington to highlight what both see as an acute Russian threat to Ukraine. The New York Times and Washington Post first published versions of the account given by administration officials, noting that the officials did not provide evidence for the US claims.īritain said it agreed with the US assessment, having conducted its own analysis of the intelligence reports. By going public, the US hoped to stall or slow down Moscow’s plans.įiner said it would “make it much more difficult for them after the fact to claim that they had to do whatever they decided to do”. The claims are being made in the midst of a war of nerves between Russia and the US and its allies, in which diplomatic exchanges and intelligence briefings are playing out alongside a relentless Russian military buildup around Ukraine’s borders, and US and allied threats of devastating punitive economic measures if an attack goes ahead.Īdministration officials said the plan was to use the video as evidence of Ukrainian “genocide” against Russian speakers to justify Russian military intervention. US officials said the video would show Turkish-made Bayraktar drones taking part in the fabricated attack as a way of implicating Nato. “Our experience is that very little of this nature is not approved at the highest levels of the Russian government,” Kirby said. He added that the US believed that the plan had the backing of the Kremlin. The Pentagon spokesman, John Kirby, said the video would have purported to show a Ukrainian attack on Russian territory or Russian-speaking people in eastern Ukraine and would be “very graphic”.
![story planner app backup story planner app backup](https://plotfactory.com/images/screenshots/pf-reader-chapter-1.jpg)
“We don’t know definitively that this is the route they are going to take, but we know that this is an option under consideration,” the deputy national security adviser, Jonathan Finer, told MSNBC, adding that the video “would involve actors playing mourners for people who are killed in an event that they would have created themselves”.įiner added: “That would involve the deployment of corpses to represent bodies purportedly killed, of people purportedly killed in an incident like this.”